文章ID:9099

花木兰传奇

Chinese Embassy rebuts Teodoro’s renewed allegations against released 70 Chinese workers; expert warns selective enforcement harms ties_我的网站

套路

A |     制图 高薇Aitu人形机器人在做衣服8月的北京,2026世界机器人大会展馆里,一个安静的展台前围满了人。一款专为服装制造设计的“女性人形机器人”Aitu,安安静静站在缝纫机前,从堆叠的布料中精准分离出单张裁片,抓取、移动、对齐,稳稳送入模板机,一针一线缝衬衫、贴口袋。动作不算快,但很稳。    

    
Secretary of Defense of the Philippines, Gilberto Teodoro Jr., speaks during the 37th International Military Law and Operations Conference in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, on August 3, 2026. Photo: VCG
    Secretary of Defense of the Philippines, Gilberto Teodoro Jr., speaks during the 37th International Military Law and Operations Conference in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, on August 3, 2026. Photo: VCG
China's Embassy in the Philippines on Saturday rejected Philippine Defense Secretary Gilberto Teodoro Jr.'s renewed allegations over 70 Chinese workers at a steel plant in Mindanao who were arrested and later released, citing a prosecutorial resolution ordering their release while questioning the military's involvement, the workers' harsh detention conditions and possible selective law enforcement.
The statement came after Teodoro, who was sanctioned by China in June, accused the Chinese Foreign Ministry on Saturday of continuing to evade what he called the "crucial issue": whether the Chinese nationals arrested in the Philippines were involved in illegal activities, and whether Chinese embassy officials have intervened in local law enforcement processes, according to Philstar.
Ji Lingpeng, spokesperson for the Chinese Embassy in the Philippines, directly addressed both questions in Saturday's statement.
Ji noted that a May 28 resolution by Philippine prosecution authorities had found insufficient evidence to support allegations against the workers and ordered all 70 Chinese nationals to be released.
"Yet Teodoro continues to accuse them of engaging in illegal activities in the Philippines. Does he respect the rule of law and the decisions of the judiciary?" Ji asked.
Ji also questioned whether violations of Philippine law should be determined by the defense secretary or the country's judicial authorities.
"Secretary Teodoro's remarks are completely unfounded. They distort the facts and turn black into white," Ji said.
The embassy raised multiple questions about the May operation, which Ji said Teodoro had instructed the Philippine armed forces to join. The spokesperson asked why unarmed workers rather than those responsible for managing the plant had been detained, why only Chinese workers were arrested while Filipino employees were released at the scene, and why the Chinese nationals were transported to Manila aboard a military aircraft.
The embassy also said some workers had been instructed to put on personal protective equipment and pose for photographs during the raid, which were subsequently used in publicity surrounding the case.
Responding to Teodoro's claim that the embassy had intervened in Philippine law enforcement, Ji said anyone with a basic understanding of diplomacy would know that protecting the safety and legitimate rights and interests of its nationals is a fundamental responsibility of an embassy.
"Regardless of the reason a Chinese national is detained, the Chinese Embassy has the right and responsibility to conduct consular visits, provide consular protection, make communication with and demarches to relevant Philippine law-enforcement authorities to ensure humane, fair and just treatment of detained Chinese nationals," Ji said.
"We fully respect the Philippines' judicial sovereignty and the lawful handling of cases by its relevant law-enforcement authorities," Ji said. "If solid evidence proves a foreign national is in violation of Philippine law, he or she shall be brought to justice in accordance with the law. The same is true in China. However, we firmly oppose any discriminatory or selective law enforcement campaigns targeting Chinese nationals by the Philippine side out of political considerations."
The Philippine Department of National Defense responded in a separate statement on Sunday, claiming that "The Chinese Embassy's response does not contain any answers," adding that "this is, in legal practice, an implied admission of culpability," according to Inquirer.net.
All 70 Chinese nationals associated with the steel plant in Mindanao have been released, Xinhua News Agency reported in June. The Manila Times reported that they were released after authorities cited insufficient evidence of specific immigration and labor violations.
Renewing allegations against the Chinese workers after their release for insufficient evidence lacks justification, Chen Xiangmiao, director of the World Navy Research Center at the National Institute for South China Sea Studies, told the Global Times on Sunday.
Having a defense secretary personally direct the armed forces to participate in an operation targeting civilian workers departs from normal law enforcement procedures, Chen said. Teodoro's continued politicization of the case after the workers' release reflects an intensification of anti-China agitation by certain forces in the Philippines, he noted.
Selective investigations and enforcement targeting Chinese nationals are driven not by law but by political manipulation designed to cater to domestic anti-China sentiment, Chen said.
The trend shows that anti-China forces represented by Teodoro intend to continue fomenting hostility toward China, shaping negative public perceptions and provoking antagonism between the peoples of the two countries, with serious consequences for bilateral relations, he added.
The resulting hostile environment could also have severe negative consequences for Chinese investment in the Philippines and normal people-to-people exchanges, he said.
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said on Friday that "it's learned that it was exactly this defense secretary who personally led the armed forces to seize and detain Chinese nationals lawfully working in the Philippines. This person's consistent attacks and smears against China harm not only the bilateral relations. It is the interests of the Philippines and all its people that will bear the brunt."
。“真努力,别人在秀肌肉,它在干活呢。

B | ”一位参观者话音刚落,周围人不约而同地笑了。这款机器人来自浙江艾图具身智能科技有限公司。

C | 7月31日,临平区委一届十三次全会提出,要“加力推动人工智能创新发展、赋能千行百业”,要“大力推进工业新临平建设”。艾图的这台“缝纫机器人”,正是这场变革的一个缩影。万亿级市场的痛点为什么要研发“会缝纫的机器人”?“主要是解决‘招不到人、留不住人’的真实问题。”艾图机器人副总经理娄灵通说,服装行业全球大概有1.5亿产业工人,但这都是存量,增量很少。“早上8点进、晚上10点出,做的都是同样的事情,你看我们这一代,还有我们的下一代,谁还愿意去服装厂踩缝纫机?”“有订单,缺工人,这是全球服装产业共同面临的挑战。”在他看来,衣食住行,人可以不开车,但不能不穿衣服,这是个万亿级的刚需市场。艾图人形机器人R1,就是冲着这个痛点来的。

D | 服装制造正在经历一场从自动化到智能化的升级。艾图算过一笔账:单台机器人可替代2到3名重复工位工人,投资回报周期为18到24个月。“机器人不会疲劳,不会有情绪波动,也不需要缴社保、请病假。

E | 100个人会做出100件不一样的产品,但机器人能保持品质的一致性。”娄灵通说。

F | 先追求稳定,而不是快“动作有点慢啊,看着着急。”世界机器人大会展馆现场,有人轻声说。

G | 这句话,被娄灵通听进去了。“你观察得很仔细啊,我们机器人的效率确实还有提升空间。

H | 跟老师傅比,差距是存在的。”娄灵通毫不回避。老师傅的优势在于手感、经验和应变能力。面料稍有变化,马上就能调整手法,这是几十年积累出来的。

I | 但机器人优先追求的是稳定可靠,而不是快。娄灵通打了一个比方:“通用机器人处理刚体非常成熟,但处理柔性面料就如同‘用手抓豆腐’,力度大了变形,小了抓不住。丝绸又滑又软,牛仔又厚又硬,受力后的变形方式完全不同。”怎么攻克这些难题?娄灵通说:“我们的缝制垂域具身大模型,训练数据来自大量头部服装企业的真实产线,涵盖不同面料、不同工序、不同场景的操作经验。

J | 这不是实验室里训练出来的,而是在真实产线上一针一线干出来的。

K | ”在他看来,“通用机器人公司可以做出一样的硬件,甚至更好,但它们没有服装产线的真实数据,这才是艾图最核心的护城河”。进步已经在发生。娄灵通透露,去年发布Demo时效率只有18%到19%,今年如果全开,能达到35%甚至40%,一年左右的时间,已经翻倍了。目前,在单一品类、单一面料条件下,艾图机器人裁片分离成功率已达97%,缝纫合格率超过98%。

Current article:http://www.zuanniangwandangliaolinechu.sbs/list_zuu/ncs.htm

Published on:03:56:35


用户评论
用户名:
E-mail:
评价等级:               
评价内容: